Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abstrahism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:35, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abstrahism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism; unreferenced. I'm not even sure that the person who claims to have invented this artistic 'movement' is truly notable; Wikipedia biog makes no mention of his "painting". TheLongTone (talk) 14:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 19:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: My searches on Highbeam and Google are turning up no independent 3rd party references for this as an art movement. AllyD (talk) 19:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a neologism that is made up by a non-notable artist that is not in use by anyone else. Delete per WP:NEO Mduvekot (talk) 23:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this reminds me of the discussion at Talk:Jesse Waugh#Pulchrism. - Brianhe (talk) 08:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.